Andrew
Sullivan has a view of blogging that I feel is not unique. He summarizes
feelings a variety of individuals can relate to, and describes in “Why I Blog”
his transition from formal writing to blogging. It seems Mr. Sullivan enjoys
being held accountable for what he says in his blog more than he ever was before, one of
the main reasons I believe he does his writing online. By publishing to the World Wide Web after
hardly an editorial scan, his thoughts can be spoken exactly as he means them,
and can skip the part of editing where others have a say in his work. By
posting exactly what he means, he gets direct feedback that, similarly, is
unwavering from its intentions. As Sullivan explains, “Alas, as I soon
discovered, this sudden freedom from above was immediately replaced by
insurrection from below.” Because there is no face to face contact in blogging,
the truth must be addressed and he can’t escape unscathed if someone has harsh
criticism of his words; but for this, I think
Sullivan is grateful. In addition, he adds that sometimes the people
challenging his views know more about the subject of his blogging than he
himself does. This puts out an interesting point- are we getting smarter when
strangers are the ones giving us feedback? By not turning to friends for
review, the sugarcoating that might usually take place in a writing process is
skipped. If, indeed, we increase our intellectual standing by having strangers ponder
our thoughts, then thank you for reading my blog. I feel smarter already.
No comments:
Post a Comment